On this blog I have often spoken about the importance of treating scripture as literature. Part of that is recognising the macrostructure of scripture at various levels. The gospels all present individual accounts of Jesus but when you compare them to each other, there is an overarching narrative structure they all follow. This macrostructure consists of basically three acts: a beginning, a middle and an end. Specifically, these parts in Jesus’ narrative are his introduction, vocation and the resolution of his mission. There is much to be said in detail about each part but instead I will provide a quick sketch. Continue reading “The Grand Drama of the Gospels”
About three years ago when I started looking into the apologetic arguments for the resurrection of Jesus a particular name cropped up fairly regularly. That was how I was introduced to work of Nicholas Thomas Wright who has since in such a short time become one of my biggest theological influences, as any regular reader of this blog would have observed. There are many great evidential arguments for the resurrection such as the minimal facts argument of Habermas and Licona. Wright takes a non-traditional approach and deals with it from an epistemological and hermeneutical stand point, that is, how you know what something means, before looking at the traditional data for it in its original historical milieu. The result is he has produced the most sophisticated and formidable defence of the resurrection in recent years: The Resurrection of the Son of God (2003), the third title in his projected six volume series Christian Origins and the Question of God. You can go here to find the lecture on which this post based which also summarizes his massive 800 page tome on the resurrection, which is well worth the read. Continue reading “Mutant Resurrection”
When we turn our attention to Paul’s reappraisal of Jewishness in Romans 2, he says that the Torah was given to the Jews as a way to be truly human i.e. the kind of human God approves. Continue reading “Man and God’s Law”
The Book of Job is one of the most challenging but also equally fascinating books in the Bible. On account of this a lot of sincere students of God’s word do not know what to make of this very important book. Old Testament scholars Tremper Longman III and John Walton have co-authored a book on just how to do that. The following is a quick overview of their work How to Read Job.
Several years ago I posted a long series on the book of Job (See here for the posts) using the commentaries written by John Walton (Job (The NIV Application Commentary)) and Tremper Longman III (Job (Baker Commentary on the Old Testament Wisdom and Psalms)) both published in August 2012. The book of Job is an often misunderstood and misused or overlooked book, but it is a powerful book and one we would do well to study. The book of Job is a profound exploration of wisdom and suffering, of the nature of God, the nature of Creation, the nature of man, and the interaction of God with his creation and his creatures. The series on Job and the detailed reading of both of these excellent commentaries along with a handful of other sources was one of the most satisfying series of posts I’ve done…
View original post 1,351 more words
This is my rough summary of N.T. Wright’s approach to biblical exegesis, highlighting the major stages in the process. Continue reading “Seeing the Wright Way (II)”
If you follow this blog you will know I mention Nicholas Thomas Wright quite a few times (a whole lot really.) So who is Tom Wright?